<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SSH Tunnels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.roweware.com/2010/02/10/ssh-tunnels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.roweware.com/2010/02/10/ssh-tunnels/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about things I think I know...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.roweware.com/2010/02/10/ssh-tunnels/comment-page-1/#comment-1471</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roweware.com/?p=183#comment-1471</guid>
		<description>Hi - I can&#039;t _quite_ tell if this is a spam comment for a personal VPN solution, but I&#039;ll reply for others here.  A SOCKS proxy does forward traffic over the SSH tunnel, so the traffic is encrypted (via the SSH tunnel), and Java/Flash are still delivered over HTTP so, that traffic will also use the SSH tunnel.  Ultimately, yes, a VPN solution is &#039;better&#039;, though I would contend that an SSH tunnel is &#039;easier&#039;.

Regardless, my purpose in using the SSH tunnels isn&#039;t to circumvent _others_ firewalls / routers, necessarily, but to also punch a hole in my own, so I can access my local network (at home) from the road without exposing anything except an SSH port, which is quite secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; I can&#8217;t _quite_ tell if this is a spam comment for a personal VPN solution, but I&#8217;ll reply for others here.  A SOCKS proxy does forward traffic over the SSH tunnel, so the traffic is encrypted (via the SSH tunnel), and Java/Flash are still delivered over HTTP so, that traffic will also use the SSH tunnel.  Ultimately, yes, a VPN solution is &#8216;better&#8217;, though I would contend that an SSH tunnel is &#8216;easier&#8217;.</p>
<p>Regardless, my purpose in using the SSH tunnels isn&#8217;t to circumvent _others_ firewalls / routers, necessarily, but to also punch a hole in my own, so I can access my local network (at home) from the road without exposing anything except an SSH port, which is quite secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vpn hosting</title>
		<link>http://blog.roweware.com/2010/02/10/ssh-tunnels/comment-page-1/#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>vpn hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.roweware.com/?p=183#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>No, that will not get the job done by itself. When I travel to China I use a personal VPN, to unblock web sites and make sure all my data is securely encrypted out of country. Since the VPN encrypts the network connection I&#039;m not worried about Java and Flash leaking information or my email getting hacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, that will not get the job done by itself. When I travel to China I use a personal VPN, to unblock web sites and make sure all my data is securely encrypted out of country. Since the VPN encrypts the network connection I&#8217;m not worried about Java and Flash leaking information or my email getting hacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

